Taking isidewith quiz (2022 edition)

 So I have results saved from other times but for the purposes of this blog, I'm gonna take a fresh one. See what my results will be.This one might be long. But going over it I don't think it's worse than the previous 8values quiz.Without further ado:

Should the President be able to authorize military force against Al-Qaeda without Congressional approval?

 In limited contexts, sure. presidents should have the ability to act unilaterally for short periods of time, but congress should authorize more lengthy engagements. 

I'm going to say yes.

And the issue is not important at all to me.

Should the US assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

Obviously it depends on the amount of evidence and the threat level involved. I'm going with the answer that only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country.

Once again, not important.

Should funding for local police departments be redirected to social and community based programs?

Yeah, I'm for defunding the police and replacing some of its functions with more friendly social services, sure.

Less important.

Should police departments be allowed to use military grade equipment?

Eh....in limited context. I dont think all police should be militarized and I would restrict it but specialized units should maintain it, yes.

Less important.

Should convicted criminals have the right to vote?

Yes. They shouldn't be denied that right.

Moderate importance, since it's a civil rights issue.

Do you support qualified immunity for police officers?

This is gonna come off as unpopular for the left, but yes, I do. I only think they should be liable under gross actions of malpractice.

Less important.

Should non-violent prisoners be released from jail in order to reduce overcrowding?

Yes, and a lot of them shouldn't even be locked up in the first place. End the war on drugs.

Moderate importance.

Should drug traffickers receive the death penalty?

No, what authoritarian BS is this?

Moderate importance.

Should prisons ban the use of solitary confinement for juveniles?

I guess? It seems cruel but I don't have a solid stance on this.

Less important.

Do you support limiting police unions collective bargaining power for cases involving misconduct?

Everyone deserves a union, even police. So...no. Even though I have misgivings on this from a civil rights perspective.

Moderate importance.

Do you support mandatory minimum prison sentences for people charged with drug possession?

Heck no, and stop throwing people in jail for drug possession. Moderate importance.

Should police officers be required to wear body cameras?

Yes. To ensure no misconduct occurs.

Moderate importance.

Should the government hire private companies to run prisons?

No. It just leads to slavery for prisoners and incentivizes arresting people. Moderate importance.

Should employers be required to pay men and women the same salary for the same job?

Yeah equal pay for equal work seems fair.

Moderate importance.

Should the government prevent “mega mergers” of corporations that could potentially control a large percentage of market share within its industry?

 Absolutely, cant have a free market if a few corporations control everything.

Moderate importance.

Should the U.S. raise taxes on the rich?

As I keep saying tax them at laffer curve peak rates. 

High importance.

Should the government raise the federal minimum wage?

Yeah. Given we don't have a UBI, $15-18 an hour sounds good.

High importance.

Do you support a universal basic income program?

Uh, hello? This is literally my top priority.

Maximum importance.

Should welfare recipients be tested for drugs?

No, and we should give people a UBI.

Given the relationship to UBI, max importance.

Should the U.S. raise or lower the tax rate for corporations?

Reise Reise tax rates reise!

Yes.

High importance.

Should there be fewer or more restrictions on current welfare benefits

 None, and we should have a UBI.

Max importance.

Do you believe labor unions help or hurt the economy?

 I'm going with help, but ban their ability to do political donations. I think unions in politics lead to corruption and act similarly to corporations. 

High importance.

Should the government increase the tax rate on profits earned from the sale of stocks, bonds, and real estate?

Yes, and set it at laffer curve peak rates.

High importance.

Should the government make cuts to public spending in order to reduce the national debt?

No, governments should tax the rich to reduce the national debt.

High importance.

Should businesses be required to provide paid leave for full-time employees during the birth of a child or sick family member?

Yes. Absolutely.

High importance.

Should the current estate tax rate be decreased?

No, should be raised if anything.

High importance.

Should the government require businesses to pay salaried employees, making up to $46k/year, time-and-a-half for overtime hours?

Yes, it's absolutely ridiculous that managers in like Wendys can make $23k a year and be worked like a dog. 

High importance.

Should the government use economic stimulus to aid the country during times of recession?

Yes. And anyone suggesting otherwise is economically illiterate.

Moderate importance.

Should the government break up Amazon, Facebook and Google?

Eh, I'd split up their respective holdings but otherwise no (think oculus, youtube, etc.). (Yes for the sake of this question).

Not important.

Should the U.S. continue to participate in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)?

Nah, let's stop that giant sucking sound as Ross Perot would say. 

Low importance.

Should pension plans for federal, state, and local government workers be transitioned into privately managed accounts?

No, sounds like a way to screw over workers.

Moderate importance.

Should homeless individuals, that have refused available shelter or housing, be allowed to sleep or encamp on public property?

Yes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing and medicine.

And also a UBI. 

High importance given the ability to advocate for more universal programs.

Should the government require children to be vaccinated for preventable diseases?

Yes. Anti vaxxers are committing child abuse against their kids. 

High importance.

Do you support the use of nuclear energy?

Yes, and I believe it's one of those things we should be using to get off of fossil fuels to prevent climate change.

High importance.

Should producers be required to label genetically engineered foods (GMOs)?

No, and we shouldnt pander to the weirdos who don't want "chemicals" in their food. Darn dihydrogen monoxide (water). 

Not important though.

Should the government fund space travel?

No, i'd rather focus on problems on THIS planet.

Low importance.

Do you support affirmative action programs?

No, we should focus more on improving working conditions and standard of living for everyone than playing this game of making person A better off at the expense of person B. Those politics are extremely divisive and offputting. 

Low importance.

Should there be more restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun?

Yes, but we shouldn't go crazy about it.

 

Low importance.

Should teachers be allowed to carry guns at school?

No, and we should stop letting republicans suggest insane ideas.

Low importance.

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

No, and this is an insane idea the left came up with that shouldn't be taken seriously either.

Low importance.

Should local police increase surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods?

No, this is blatantly racist. 

Low importance.

Are you in favor of decriminalizing drug use?

Yes. 

Moderate importance.

Should it be illegal to burn the American flag?

No, this is a free speech issue.

Moderate importance.

Should people on the “no-fly list” be banned from purchasing guns and ammunition?

I'm gonna go with: "Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process." 

I mean, if they shouldnt fly on a plane they shouldnt buy guns. 

BUT....there should be due process to the idea.

Low importance.

Should the Supreme Court be reformed to include more seats and term limits on judges?

Yes, but only term limits.

 

Moderate importance.

Do you support the Patriot Act?

No, it was a blatant violation of civil liberties.

Moderate importance.

Should the government be allowed to seize private property, with reasonable compensation, for public or civic use?

You mean eminent domain?

Yes. But to be more specific I'm going with this option: "Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community"

 

Low importance

Should the U.S. government grant immunity to Edward Snowden?

Yes, and he should be protected as a whistleblower.

 

No importance

Should social media companies ban political advertising?

I don't really have an opinion on this. Gonna default to no but make it have no importance.

Should members of Congress be allowed to trade stocks while serving in office?

No, it allowed corruption.

Moderate importance.

Should the military upgrade Air Force One?

No, what's wrong with AF1 as it is?

No importance.

Should internet service providers be allowed to speed up access to popular websites (that pay higher rates) at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites (that pay lower rates)?

No. And impose net neutrality.

High importance.

Should there be term limits set for members of Congress?

Yes. It's needed to solve the incumbency problem.

Moderate importance.

Should the government regulate social media sites, as a means to prevent fake news and misinformation?

No, and that strikes me as extremely authoritarian.

High importance.

Should illegal immigrants have access to government-subsidized healthcare?

No. In order to make my calls for universal safety nets work, I need to take a stronger stance against immigration. 

Moderate importance

Should the U.S. build a wall along the southern border?

No. A wall is a monument to our racism and doesn't do much.

Not important.

Should undocumented immigrants be offered in-state tuition rates at public colleges within their residing state?

No, undocumented immigrants shouldn't get anything.

Moderate importance.

Should children of illegal immigrants be granted legal citizenship?

Via the whole birthright citizenship thing? No. But it'll never happen because it'll require a constitutional amendment to stop. Low importance.

Should local law enforcement be allowed to detain illegal immigrants for minor crimes and transfer them to federal immigration authorities?

 No they should focus on deporting criminals. 

Low importance.

Should sanctuary cities receive federal funding?

Yeah. I'm gonna be honest, I dont care much about deporting illegals and the like either way.

Low importance.

Should Muslim immigrants be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

No. Seems racist and largely unnecessary.

Low importance.

Should working illegal immigrants be given temporary amnesty?

"Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record"

 

Low importance.

Should immigrants be required to learn English?

Yeah they should learn English and adapt to our culture.

Moderate importance.

Should immigrants be required to pass a citizenship test to demonstrate a basic understanding of our country’s language, history, and government?

To become citizens and get access to those sweet sweet safety nets I'm for, sure.

Otherwise, not really. 

So I'm going with no.

No importance.

Should the US increase or decrease the amount of temporary work visas given to high-skilled immigrant workers?

Decrease. Importing them in is about lowering wages.

Moderate importance.

Should the U.S. increase restrictions on its current border security policy?

No. Im for the status quo.

Low importance.

Should immigrants to the United States be allowed to hold dual citizenship status?

I dont see why not.

Not important.

Should immigrants be deported if they commit a serious crime?

Absolutely.

Moderate importance.

Should there be a temporary ban on all immigration into the United States?

No, and I don't see any reason why we should. 

 

Low importance.

Do you support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)?

 "Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better"

Max importance.

Should the government require employees of large businesses to be vaccinated from COVID?

Yes, and screw anti vaxxers' feelings on the subject. 

High importance.

Should the federal government increase funding of health care for low income individuals (Medicaid)?

"Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system"

Max importance.

Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

Yes. 

Less important.

Do you support a single-payer healthcare system?

Yes. 

Max importance obviously.

Should people be required to work in order to receive Medicaid?

No, in line with my single payer idea.

 

Max importance obviously.

Do you support the legalization of Marijuana?

 Yes. 

Somewhat important.

Should cities open drug “safe havens” where people who are addicted to illegal drugs can use them under the supervision of medical professionals?

Yes, it prevents people from ODing.

Low importance.

Should there be more or less privatization of veterans’ healthcare?

Less, we should have a single payer system.

Max importance.

Should the government regulate the prices of life-saving drugs?

"Yes, and we should socialize medicine and healthcare"

 

SINGLE PAYER BABY!

 

Max importance.

Should the federal government be allowed to negotiate drug prices for Medicare?

Yes, and we should have a single payer monopsony to reduce prices overall.

Max importance.

Should private businesses have the right to ask customers for their vaccination status? 

Yes, and screw anti vaxxers feelings.

High importance.

Should health insurers be allowed to deny coverage to individuals who have a pre-existing condition?

No, and we should have single payer.

Max importance.

Should the government increase funding for mental health research and treatment?

Yes.

Somewhat important.

Should the government increase spending on public transportation?

Yeah. I know I kind of criticize the green new dealers a bit but we should have decent public transportation honestly.

Somewhat important.

Should critical race theory be taught in K-12 education?

Eh, I'm going with this one:

"Yes, but not until they are teenagers"

 

I mean, we shouldn't be anti CRT. It's a valid theory, but it should be taught primarily at high school level and in such a way to inform and educate rather than to indoctrinate. SJWs wanna brainwash people with this stuff. Some of the other yes options were things like "Yes, and also add Intersectionality and the 1619 Project to the curriculum" and "Yes, we cannot end racism until we acknowledge that our institutions, laws, and history are inherently racist". Those things aren't education, that's BRAINWASHING. They're trying to indoctrinate kids, not inform them.

 

For me, its a fine line. I'm fine with informing and educating kids, but not trying to radicalize them into a specific political ideology. 

 

Somewhat important.

Should the federal government pay for tuition at four-year colleges and universities?

 Yes. Absolutely. Priority #3. Max importance.

Do you support increasing taxes for the rich in order to reduce interest rates for student loans?

Tax the ultra rich and forgive student loans like Bernie wants to do.

 

For reference I'm actually clicking: "Yes, and increase government funding so every student receives a free college education"

 

Max importance.

Should the federal government fund Universal preschool?

Yes, but i dont emphasize it since I see the gung ho proponents as wanting to indoctrinate kids into the workforce even earlier and use school as a glorified daycare so parents can work.

 

Somewhat important.

Do you support Common Core national standards?

Yes, but I don't care.

Not important.

Do you support charter schools?

No, and they're a republican trojan horse to undermine the public school system.

Moderate importance.

Should the government decriminalize school truancy?

Yes, jailing parents because their kids stop going to school when they're too busy working is dumb and inhumane. 

Low importance.

Should the government provide financial aid to families affected by COVID related school closures?

I guess. 

Not important.

Should the government offer students a voucher that they can use to attend private schools?

No, this is what I was saying about republican trojan horse.

Somewhat important.

Should the government increase or decrease military spending?

Decrease. We could decrease it by 25% and still spend twice as much as China.

More important.

Should the U.S. accept refugees from Syria?

Yes and Americans should stop being so racist.

Less important.

Should foreign terrorism suspects be given constitutional rights?

Yes. They should be treated fairly as much as possible as we would anyone else.

Somewhat important.

Should the military be allowed to use enhanced interrogation techniques, such as waterboarding, to gain information from suspected terrorists?

No, it doesn't work and it's inhumane.

Somewhat important.

Should the US increase or decrease foreign aid spending?

Keep the same amount.

Low importance.

Should the U.S. continue to support Israel?

Yes, for geopolitical reasons.

Low importance.

Should every 18 year old citizen be required to provide at least one year of military service?

Heck no, that's slavery to me.

Max importance.

Should the U.S. remain in the United Nations?

Yes.

Somewhat important.

Should the military fly drones over foreign countries to gain intelligence and kill suspected terrorists?

Intelligence, yes, killing terrorists, no, not unless they're completely sure.

Somewhat important.

Do you support President Obama’s move to lift the trade and travel embargo on Cuba?

Yes, its a cold era policy that's no longer relevant.

Not important.

Should Jerusalem be recognized as the capital of Israel?

Yes, but I don't care about Israel much one way or another.

not important.

Should the U.S. remain in NATO?

Yes, and I think the Russian invasion of Ukraine demonstrated NATO's relevance in the 21st century.

Somewhat important.

Should the U.S. defend other NATO countries that maintain low military defense budgets relative to their GDP?

Yes, while I agree with Trump's desire to make other countries meet their requirements, I really thought his approach of airing those grievances publicly were dumb and harmful to international discourse though. 

Somewhat important.

Should the U.S. continue NSA surveillance of its allies?

Allies? Only with permission. 

I'm gonna go with no.

Not important.

Should the government cancel production of the F-35 fighter?

Yes, it seems to be a massive waste.

Less important.

Should the World Bank and International Monetary Fund provide financial aid to the Taliban government in Afghanistan?

No, we gave them their country back, let's not give them financial aid too.

Less important.

Should the U.S. sell military weapons to India in order to counter Chinese and Russian influence?

Eh, Im actually gonna go with yes on this one. Because they seemed awfully unwilling to speak out against Russia due to their trade relations with them. 

Not important though.

Should the U.S. go to war with Iran?

No and this is a stupid and dangerous idea. 

High importance.

Should the government continue to fund Planned Parenthood?

Yes.

More important.

What is your stance on abortion?

Pro choice as it gets.

More important.

Do you support the legalization of same sex marriage?

Yes.

Somewhat important.

Should transgender athletes be allowed to compete against athletes that differ from their assigned sex at birth?

I don't have a solid opinion, so I went with this:

"Yes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete"

 

Either way, I don't care. Not important.

Should health insurance providers be required to offer free birth control?

Yes, and this should fall under healthcare, so max importance.

Should “gender identity” be added to anti-discrimination laws?

Yes.

Somewhat important.

Should gay couples have the same adoption rights as straight couples?

Yes, somewhat important.

Should a business be able to deny service to a customer if the request conflicts with the owner’s religious beliefs?

No. Businesses should suck it up and deal with it.

Somewhat important.

Should the federal government institute a mandatory buyback of assault weapons?

No, and this is a blatant violation of the right to bear arms.

Somewhat important.

Should universities provide “trigger warnings” and “safe spaces” for students?

No, you're in college to learn, they shouldn't coddle your feelings. 

Low importance.

Should businesses be required to have women on their board of directors?

Literal "MORE*clap*FEMALE*clap*CEOS" material right here.

No. This is more affirmative action crap.

Low importance.

Should the federal government require racial sensitivity training for employees?

For police maybe, for everyone? No.

Not important.

Do you support the death penalty?

No, it's barbaric.

Moderate importance.

Should states be allowed to display the Confederate flag on government property?

No its a flag of traitors and racists.

Low importance though.

Should the government support a separation of church and state by removing references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments?

Yes, we should have separation of church and state. Low importance though.

Should the military allow women to serve in combat roles?

Yeah if they can pass the physical tests.

Moderate importance.

Should women be allowed to wear a Niqāb, or face veil, to civic ceremonies?

Why not? Either way I don't care. Not important.

Should hate speech be protected by the first amendment?

Yes, this is a matter of free speech.

Moderate importance.

Should the government increase environmental regulations to prevent climate change?

Yes. Absolutely. Do what is needed to save the planet.

High importance.

Should the U.S. withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement?

No, and doing so was dumb.

High importance.

Should drilling be allowed in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge?

No, and we should be getting off of oil. 

 

High importance.

Should disposable products (such as plastic cups, plates, and cutlery) that contain less than 50% of biodegradable material be banned?

This I'm gonna say no on as it seems too extreme. Low importance though.

Should the U.S. expand offshore oil drilling?

 No and we should kick the oil addiction.

High importance.

Do you support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources?

No, and we need to get off of oil.

High importance.

Should the government give tax credits and subsidies to the wind power industry?

Absofreakinglutely.

Max importance.

Should the government stop construction of the Dakota Access pipeline?

Yes, but it's not important because then we'd have to reroute oil elsewhere anyway.

Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

How else do you suggest we test such things?

Low importance.

Should cities be allowed to offer private companies economic incentives to relocate?

Heck no. And the fact that we do so is screwed up. 

More important.

Should foreigners, currently residing in the United States, have the right to vote?

"Yes, but only after living in the country for 5 years"

 

Low importance.

Should the electoral college be abolished?

"Yes, and switch to a ranked voting system"

 

Ranked choice voting baby!

 

High importance.

Should a photo ID be required to vote?

 no this is just a way for the right to engage in voter suppression while claiming to care about fraud.

Somewhat important.

Should political candidates be required to release their recent tax returns to the public?

After Donald Trump, yeah, I'd very much like to see their tax returns. 

Low importance.

Should there be a limit to the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor?

"Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections"

 

High importance

Should the minimum voting age be lowered?

I'm fine with 18. 

Low importance.

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

Depends on the crime. Like Trump? He shouldn't be allowed to run again. But someone who otherwise served their time and didn't commit a political crime? Sure.

Less important.

Should corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations be allowed to donate to political parties?

No, get all money out of politics.

More important.

Should foreign lobbyists be allowed to raise money for American elections?

No, again, all money out of politics.

More important.

Should there be a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists after they leave the government?

"Yes, and make it a lifetime ban"

 

Andrew Yang had some interesting proposals on this.

 

 More important.

If the 2022 Pennsylvania Lieutenant Governor election were held today, which candidate would you vote for?

Austin Davis. Pretty sure he was the democrat.

Less important.

If the 2022 Pennsylvania Gubernatorial election were held today, which candidate would you vote for?

Josh Shapiro. Gonna vote blue primarily to protect abortion rights here in PA.

More important.

If the 2022 Pennsylvania US Senate election were held today, which candidate would you vote for?

 Fetterman is awesome. 

More important.

Whom would you most like to run for President in 2024?

I wrote in Andrew Yang.

Max importance.

If the 2022 Pennsylvania Auditor election were held today, which candidate would you vote for?

Tim Defoor. I mean, he was the only one listed, so.

Not important.

Which qualities are most important to you in a candidate?

Vision,  honesty, leadership, determination, ability to inspire, morality.

Basically, I want someone with a strong vision and a strong moral compass, a strong grasp on policy, and a willingness to stick to one's guns. 

Of course not all of those were mentioned here. I'm writing in policy too.

Results

Parties

90% socialist

89% green

88% transhumanist

87% democratic

85% peace and freedom

80% american solidarity

29% libertarian

13% republican

10% constitution

So I scored very highly on left wing parties and very lowly on right wing parties. Which is weird given how often I strayed from the left wing doctrine on a lot of social justicey type issues. Seriously, lefties castigate me for my relative conservative stance on immigration.

But it just goes to show, for as much as I have disagreements with them, I statistically agree with them 85-90% of the time. They're way too purity testy in that sense.

To be fair, I am too. A lot of these parties aren't aligned with my priorities either. And I dont really identify strongly with any of these parties. I'm not a socialist, I dont align with the greens on more than a nominal level, and the democrats I hate with a passion. 

So I feel like this ignores a lot of differences there. 

Senate candidates

91% John Fetterman

40% Erik Gerhardt

15% Mehmet Oz

No mistake here. Fetterman is Bernie with a beard and tattoos. And Oz is a joke. 

And yeah not a lot of agreement with the right libs either.

Governor

91% Josh Shapiro

44% Joe Soloski

18% Doug Mastriano

No mistake here either. Shapiro is as weak as wet cardboard for me, but again, playing defensive on abortion rights here. Mastriano is a bit of a nutcase. he's a literal Jan 6ther. 

Lt. Governor

91% Austin Davis

18% Carrie DelRosso

15% Tim McMaster

Yep, again, a lot closer to the democrat than the republican/libertarian candidates.

President

90% Bernie Sanders

89% Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

88% Elizabeth Warren

86% Kamala Harris

85% Pete Buttigieg

84% Amy Klobuchar

82% Tulsi Gabbard

79% Joe Biden

75% Mark Cuban

 

23% Nikki Haley

 

22% Candace Owens

 

19% Donald Trump 

17% Marco Rubio

16% Rand Paul

16% Mike Pence

14% Ron Desantis

13% Ben Shapiro

12% Ted Cruz

No real surprises here. Bernie is the best candidate on this list, and yes, AOC and Warren are next.

Harris I'm actually warming up on a lot. Looking at her 2020 policy like with healthcare, she wasn't that bad. I didnt like her since I thought she was a fake compared to Bernie, but Harris actually had a somewhat respectable platform. Not as progressive as I'd like but I could tolerate her. Better than Biden.

Beyond that just...ugh.

Buttigieg by my own analyses is worse than Biden. He's like eating drywall flavored oatmeal to me.

Klobuchar, ugh. Tulsi Gabbard I used to like but she went like full right winger recently so screw her.

Biden, eh...i'd flip him and buttigieg honestly. 

Mark Cuban, he might run on Yang's forward party. I dont like him ANYWHERE near as much as Yang.

Yang is totally scrubbed but I remember in 2020 my result with him was weird. Like 82% or something. Then again outside of UBI he was a pretty bog standard democrat with a few interesting ideas. Even on healthcare the dude just imploded. 

I like him for his ideology but yeah he is a bit iffy on other positions sometimes.

I'm growing more willing to tolerate moderation as long as my top goals are reached though. Given how much weight i give to UBI i can overlook a lot of the crap Yang does. 

Beyond that, you see a very steep dropoff as we enter republican territory and i only agree with them 12-25%  of the time. 

Yeah. That's...about right. 

I do think this test tends to ignore a lot of progressive infighting and purity tests, but yeah, either way despite whatever flaws I have compared to a lot of other more progressive lefties, im a lot closer to then than the right. Here's the proof. And yeah, it goes the other way. I can still agree with Biden 80% of the time on here when in reality weighting my priorities it's more like 40% of the time. So yeah. Not a perfect test, but it's still worth taking.

Anyway, that's the last test I planned on talking here. I just wanted to post a few of them, get an idea of where I'm at and make it public knowledge.

You now should know how I think about roughly every issue.